The red syenite of the Pilansberg complex as a nepheline source for the South African ceramics and glass industry
Abstract (Summary)
5
1. INTRODUCTION
6
1.1. Statement of question
6
1.2. The hypothesis
7
1.3. Assumptions
7
1.4. Purpose of the study
7
1.5. Acknowledgements
8
2. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
9
2.1. Geology of the Pilanesberg Complex
9
2.1.1. Red Foyaite
11
2.1.2. White
&
Grey Foyaite
12
2.1.3. Tinguaite
13
2.1.4. Green Foyaite
13
2.1.5. Ledig Foyaite
14
2.1.6. Red Syenite
14
2.1.7. Volcanic rocks
15
2.2. Age of the plutonic rocks
15
2.3. Mineral potential of the Pilanesberg
16
2.3.1. Gold
16
2.3.2. Rare earth Elements
16
2.3.3. Dimension Stone
17
3. GENERAL DISCUSSION OF NEPHELINE AND ASSOCIATED DEPOSITS
18
3.1. Characteristics of nepheline
18
3.2. Classification of nepheline syenite ore deposits
19
3.3. Distribution of nepheline syenite deposits
19
3.3.1. Two deposits described for beneficiation
21
3.3.1.1.
Table Mountain Deposit, Oregon
21
3.3.1.2.
Bulls Run Syenite Complex, South Africa
22
3.4. Evaluation of raw material required in ceramics and glass
22
3.4.1. General testing and evaluation
23
3.4.2. General beneficiation testwork
23
3.4.3. Test for ceramic application
24
3.4.4. Test for glass application
24
4. THE CURRENT INVESTIGATION
25
4.1. Market study
25
4.2. Exploration programme
25
2
University of Pretoria etd Pantshi B 2006
4.3. Data analysis
25
5. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
26
5.1. Local market conditions
26
5.1.1. Ceramics market
27
5.1.2. Glass market
27
5.1.3. Local market investigation
27
5.2. International market conditions
27
5.3. Petrography and chemical composition of the Red Syenite
28
5.4. Resources and reserves and production rate
34
5.5. Benchmarking – nepheline vs. feldspar
35
6. PROJECT EVALUATION
38
6.1. Mine planning
38
6.2. Beneficiation
39
6.3. Rehabilitation programme
39
6.4. Costs
40
6.5. Financial evaluation
41
6.5.1. Inflation rate
42
6.5.2. Discount rate
42
6.5.3. Interest rate
42
6.5.4. Royalty
42
6.5.5. Tax rate
43
6.5.6. Beneficiated product (Scenario 1)
43
6.5.6.1.
Discounted cashflow model
43
6.5.6.2.
Sensitivity analysis
45
6.5.7. Unbeneficiated product
(Scenario 2)
49
6.5.7.1.
Discounted cashflow model
49
6.5.7.2.
Sensitivity analysis
50
6.6. Qualitative risk analysis
55
TABLES
Table 1 - Physical characteristics of nepheline
Table 2 - Various nepheline syenite rocks
Table 3 – Chemical compositions of processed nepheline
Table 4 - World production of nepheline in 2004
Table 5 – Consumption of nepheline in United States of America
3
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57
8. REFERENCES 60
University of Pretoria etd Pantshi B 2006
Table 6 – Individual sample analysis results and statistics
Table 7 – Chemical analysis results of nepheline syenite deposits
Table 8 – Comparison of the petrography of nepheline syenite deposits
Table 9 – Petrographic classification of nepheline-bearing deposits
Table 10 – South African production, local sales and export of feldspar
Table 11 - World production of feldspar by country – 10 top producers
Table 12 - Basic properties of feldspar and nepheline
Table 13 – Discounted cashflow model for the beneficiated product
Table 14 – Sensitivity analysis – beneficiated product
Table 15 – Discounted cashflow model for the unbeneficiated product
Table 16 – Sensitivity analysis – unbeneficiated product
Table 17 – Qualitative risk analysis
Table 18 – Base case comparison of the two scenarios investigated
Bibliographical Information:
Advisor:
School:University of Pretoria/Universiteit van Pretoria
School Location:South Africa
Source Type:Master's Thesis
Keywords:syenite nepheline ceramic industries glass manufacture south africa
ISBN:
Date of Publication: