Toward a more complete ethic in technical communication an examination, evaluation, and integration of some foundational and nonfoundational ethical theories /
Abstract (Summary)
In this study, I examine several theories of ethics in technical communication. In
doing so, I rely primarily on research in technical, professional, and business
communication. In particular, I follow the lead of Mike Markel by separating ethical
theories into two categories: foundational and nonfoundational.
I examine three popular manifestations of foundational ethical theories in
technical communication: universal values (such as honesty), utilitarianism, and Kantian
ethics. I show how technical communication appropriates each theory but also how these
theories can be problematic if communicators rely too heavily and exclusively upon
them.
Next, I explore two important nonfoundational theories in technical
communication: dialogic ethics and professional ethics. Again, I illustrate how these
theories apply to technical communication, but, again, I find that it can be dangerous to
use solely these theories.
Finally, I look to Mike Markel to find an ethical theory that integrates both
foundational and nonfoundational ethics. I term this ethic contextual foundational. I
explain how this ethic would function in technical communication and also how it could
help mitigate some of the problems that arise in relying too exclusively on either
foundational or nonfoundational ethics. I use examples from the Challenger disaster to
illustrate how this contextual foundational ethic might benefit technical communicators.
iii
Bibliographical Information:
Advisor:
School:The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
School Location:USA - Tennessee
Source Type:Master's Thesis
Keywords:
ISBN:
Date of Publication: