Substitute Natural Gas Feasibility Study
The results indicated a marginal environment for the long-term contracts that are necessary to finance these plants. Consumer savings scenarios changed drastically during the 3-month period of this study. Initial projected savings of over 30% fell to a loss of 9%, far short of the minimum 25% estimated savings required. This was a result of a significant drop in gas prices, and served to illustrate the consumers need for a large discount over spot prices to mitigate their price risk. As far as developers are concerned, an $8 price of gas was determined to be financially marginal, with returns of 8% predicted. Rising plant costs would tend to put upward pressure on this price point, driving even higher minimum selling prices.
In addition, if one adds the consumers need for a 25% discount to the developers minimum price level of $8, it appears that at least $11 gas is required to satisfy both parties. The current climate of $8 gas thus look unfavorable to the development of SNG contracts, with the exception of potential site locations in regions of high gas prices, cheap coal, or more direct access to end users with the increased value capture that entails. While concerns about high gas prices and energy security will not likely go away any time soon, the time is not yet ripe for SNG development.
Advisor:Pratson, Lincoln
School:Duke University
School Location:USA - North Carolina
Source Type:Master's Thesis
Keywords:sng coal gas gasification
ISBN:
Date of Publication:12/02/2008