Selected employee attributes and perceptions regarding methods and animal welfare concerns associated with swine euthanasia
Abstract (Summary)
MATTHIS, JOHN STEVEN. Selected Employee Attributes And
Perceptions Regarding Methods And Animal Welfare Concerns
Associated With Swine Euthanasia. (Under the direction of Dr.
Richard T. Liles.)
The purpose of this study is to determine selected
employee attributes on their perceptions regarding swine
euthanasia and to explore their animal welfare concerns
associated with swine euthanasia. This study establishes the
most prevalent personality types among swine employees in
Eastern North Carolina. The following independent factors will
be used to determine an employee’s willingness to perform
euthanasia and attitude toward euthanasia. These factors
include socio-demographic factors, socio-psychological
factors, farm factors, and euthanasia methods. The information
was obtained by visiting 47 swine farms in eastern North
Carolina where a total of 388 surveys were administered with a
100% return rate.
The objectives of the study were developed from the
analysis of focus group participation and scrutinized by peer
review. The selected objects for this research project
include:
1. Which method of euthanasia, blunt trauma or carbon
dioxide gas do employees prefer?
2. Does the employee perceive the pain of the pig an
important factor when choosing a euthanasia method?
3. Do employees perceive safety as an important factor
in performing euthanasia?
4. Which method of euthanasia, blunt trauma or carbon
dioxide gas do employees perceive as being the
fastest method of euthanasia for the pig?
5. What method of euthanasia training do employees
prefer?
6. Do employees perceive the the time it takes to
complete the euthanasia process an important factor
in choosing a method?
7. Do employees perceive the euthanasia as being a
stressful part of the job?
8. Is there a correlation between a employee’s
temperament and his or her willingness to euthanize
pigs and his or her attitude toward euthanizing?
9. Do selected socio-demographic factors influence an
employee’s attitude toward euthanasia and/or
willingness to euthanize pigs?
10. Selected socio-psychological factors do have an
effect on an employee’s attitude and/or willingness
to euthanize.
11. Do selected farm factors influence an employee’s
attitude toward euthanasia and/or willingness to
euthanize pigs?
12. Do selected euthanasia methods influence an
employee’s attitude toward euthanasia and/or
willingness to euthanize pigs?
13. Does a combination of independent variables in the
multivariate model influence an employee’s attitude
toward euthanasia and/or willingness to euthanize
pigs?
The results of the survey concluded that regardless of
their age, gender, or ethnic background, employees preferred a
method of euthanasia that was perceived as less painful to the
pig. The majority of the respondents have a personality type
of ESTJ based on the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II. The swine
employees in this study did not represent the INTP personality
type.
Most of the employees did not feel stressed by having to
perform euthanasia as long as the animal appeared sick. Most
of the employees viewed euthanasia of a sick pig as a humane
alternative to letting the animal die naturally. A majority of
employees prefer to use a process that is less painful to the
pig even though it may take longer. Most of the employees
prefer to be trained on the farm. A majority of employees
perceive blunt trauma to be the safest method for the 1 to 12
pound pig. A majority of employees perceive carbon dioxide gas
to be safer than blunt trauma or the bolt gun method.
A majority of the employees did not have a problem performing
euthanasia as a part of their daily job functions.
Selected Employee Attributes And Perceptions
Regarding Methods And Animal Welfare Concerns
Associated
With Swine Euthanasia
Steven Matthis
A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of
North Carolina State University
In partial fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of
Doctoral of Education
Bibliographical Information:
Advisor:
School:North Carolina State University
School Location:USA - North Carolina
Source Type:Master's Thesis
Keywords:north carolina state university
ISBN:
Date of Publication: