(No)bodies in education blurred boundaries in teacher-student relationships /
Abstract (Summary)
I use a feminist, quasi-poststructural theoretical framework to investigate teachers who both
illustrate and complicate the distinction between what Erica McWilliam terms pedagogical
eroticism and pedagogical abuse. My primary data sources are interviews and artifacts collected
from Hannah and Kim, high school English teachers who have had a sexual relationship with a
student. I frame their cases with Mary Kay Letourneau and Heather Ingram, two headline-heavy
teachers whose backgrounds and affair patterns are similar to Hannah’s and Kim’s. All four
women have in common a troubled family history, a void from an unhappy relationship, and a
holistic pedagogical approach; and they fell in love with their students in the process of saving
them from academic failure. The women exemplify cases in which a teacher-student boundary
was clearly crossed, although it is not always clear who the victim was, or if there was one at all.
My intent is to illustrate how this boundary crossing happens so that educators can understand
the conditions under which such a crossing is made possible and recognize the indicators that the
sexual dynamic present in any pedagogical relationship may be something different, something
dangerous. I consider when the condition of eros becomes the problem of abuse, making the
argument that the Cartesian duality pervasive in education is a contributing factor. My data
chapters take the reader through the development of a teacher-student affair, with particular
attention to the onset of the relationships, the justifications the teachers used to rationalize their
choices, the teacher/lover role tension they experienced, and the denouements of both the
relationships and the women’s teaching careers.
Bibliographical Information:
Advisor:
School:The University of Georgia
School Location:USA - Georgia
Source Type:Master's Thesis
Keywords:
ISBN:
Date of Publication: