Mystical experiences, neuroscience, and the nature of reality
Abstract (Summary)
Marvin Belzer, Advisor
Research by neuroscientists has begun to clarify some of the types of brain activity
associated with mystical experiences. Neuroscientists disagree about the implications of
their research for mystics’ beliefs about the nature of reality, however. Persinger, Alper,
and other scientific materialists believe that their research effectively disproves mystics’
interpretations of their experiences, while Newberg, Hood, and others believe that
scientific models of mystical experiences leave room for God or some other transcendent
reality. I argue that Persinger and Alper are correct in dismissing mystics’ interpretations
of their experiences, but that they are incorrect in asserting mystical experiences are
pathological or otherwise undesirable.
To Betty, who knows from experience.
iv
v
Bibliographical Information:
Advisor:
School:Bowling Green State University
School Location:USA - Ohio
Source Type:Master's Thesis
Keywords:mysticism reality neurosciences science and spiritualism
ISBN:
Date of Publication: