Innovation, Imitation, Legitimacy and Deviance in the Design of Graphical Trademarks in the United States, 1884-2003
Abstract (Summary)
Graphical trademarks, or logos, represent important aspects of organizational
identity and have become ubiquitous in society. Although the conventional wisdom of
practitioners in design and business dictates that trademarks should be unique and
distinctive, anecdotal evidence suggests that many trademarks appear to be similar to one
another. This dissertation attempts to understand patterns of similarity and difference in
graphical trademark design through the lens of neoinstitutional theory in sociology.
Using data on trademarks from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the
designs of the over 750,000 graphical trademarks filed in the United States between 1884
and 2003 are analyzed in terms of their content, design complexity, and degree of design
realism or abstraction. A series of hypotheses regarding trademark design dynamics is
tested. Evidence is found suggesting that, rather than providing distinctiveness,
trademarks serve to provide legitimacy to organizations by imitating the symbols
employed by other organizations, particularly those within the same industry. Further
analysis examines the institutionalization and deinstitutionalization of norms in
trademark design within industries over time. Finally, the survival of trademarks that
deviate from design norms, relative to more normal trademarks, is studied. While such
“deviant” trademarks do not seem more likely to be abandoned or cancelled or to expire,
further study suggests that trademarks that adhere most strictly to design norms are more
likely to survive in use over time.
16
Bibliographical Information:
Advisor:
School:The University of Arizona
School Location:USA - Arizona
Source Type:Master's Thesis
Keywords:
ISBN:
Date of Publication: