Describing firm's behavior from revenue and cost data
Abstract (Summary)
The main objective of this research is to discuss and extend the existing literature that
is concerned with the estimation of demand and supply parameters to determine
unobserved prices, quantities, quality and marginal costs at the firm-level using data
sets that reports only revenue and cost figures. A common approach to estimate these
parameters is given by the production function. However, to be implemented it needs
output data, which most plant-level data sets do not report. In the second chapter (the
first one is an introduction), using the same framework, I shall investigate the
consequences of ignoring price heterogeneity on the markup estimates from the
production function in plant or firm–levels studies. I show that ignoring output price
heterogeneity yield markup estimates severely biased towards one regardless of
competitiveness levels. I set up an econometric model that assumes monopolistic
competition and a CES demand function in a differentiated product market that is
easy to estimate and allows for the use aggregate instruments to improve on the OLS
estimations. In the third chapter, I discuss the estimation of discrete-choice model of
demand. Katayma, Lu and Tybout (2003) used a nested logit model to derive
consumer and producer surplus to measure efficiency. Their work (KLT) however
differentiates from the others since the data set used there is not quite informative.
Again, it assumes that only revenue and total costs are observed. Then combining
these data with demand and the quasi-supply relation they demonstrate how to
estimate the parameters of interest. I demonstrate how to extend the KLT framework
by including the extra information provided by aggregate data. Although it may be
difficult to obtain detailed data on quantities at the plant level, the same is not true for
aggregate variables. I consider two different hypotheses on the nature of this
aggregate measure. The first one assumes that this information is noisy, while the
second assumes that this information is deterministic and therefore error free. Each
assumption yields a different estimation strategy with potentially yield different
parameter estimates. With the preference parameters, qualities and marginal costs
determined according to the methodology developed in the third chapter, one is able
to construct consumer and producer welfare measures. The first two sections of the
third chapter present counterfactual experiments. They consist on assuming
exogenous changes in the market environment and analyzing the consequent welfare
variation. The former simulation assumes a sharp price decrease in the imported good
price. As expected, due to competitive pressures and consequent lower prices,
consumer welfare goes up and producers’ profits go down. In turn, the second section
simulates a regulatory action whose objective is to split up the existing monopoly
owned by Bavaria S.A. After the break up, the company does not internalize the price
decision of all domestic beers in the market, then prices go down and similar welfare
effects take place. Finally, the last section discusses the construction of welfare-based
price indices and the identification of intertemporal welfare variation.
iv
Bibliographical Information:
Advisor:
School:Pennsylvania State University
School Location:USA - Pennsylvania
Source Type:Master's Thesis
Keywords:
ISBN:
Date of Publication: