Beyond Bad Dogs: Toward a Pedagogy of Engagement of Male Students
Abstract (Summary)
As Student Affairs has developed as a profession, scholars and practitioners have
identified deficiencies in classical identity development theory pertaining to women; gay,
lesbian, bi-sexual, or trans-gendered people; people of color, people with disabilities; and
other historically underrepresented identities. Further, the school of thought is that
student development theory is primarily based on research subjects who are
middle/upper-class Caucasian men and thus is applicable to this population primarily.
Thus, newer scholarship has emerged to explain identity development in particular
minority groups and women. This project argues that classical theory not only fails to
capture salient developmental processes of marginalized groups, but in fact fails to
capture elements of male identity development. While the theories are gendered male per
se (due to the subjects studied), they are resonant with hegemonic (socially constructed
and imposed) masculinity rather than an authentic human masculine identity. There are
consequences to this for men and women.
The Student Affairs field has established knowledge, values, and best practices,
which is inculcated into new practitioners through the professional socialization process.
The purpose of this constructivist inquiry was to examine this process, its underlying
values and norms, and its effect on professionals’ conceptions of male students.
Seventeen Residence Hall Directors with graduate degrees in Student Development or
related disciplines were interviewed about their socialization into the field, thoughts
about male students, and reactions to a case example depicting an incident on a college
campus. Findings suggest a lack of theoretical or conceptual understanding of male
gender identities, and consequently a difficulty in viewing male students
developmentally. Moreover, without such understanding, new professionals’ conception
of marginalized identities can unwittingly reify rather than interrupt stratification and
privilege.
9
Bibliographical Information:
Advisor:
School:The University of Arizona
School Location:USA - Arizona
Source Type:Master's Thesis
Keywords:
ISBN:
Date of Publication: